AGI: The Future of Work and Societal Impact

Mo Gawdat, the former Chief Business Officer at Google X, addressed the potential of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on the Diary of a CEO podcast. He expressed significant concerns that AGI could soon surpass human capabilities in almost every job, including roles traditionally seen as secure, such as programmers and executives.

Gawdat stated, “Unless you’re in the top 0.1%, you’re a peasant.” He believes that AGI may outperform humans even in high-level positions like that of a CEO.

Socioeconomic Turmoil Ahead

According to Gawdat, the upcoming 15 years will be a challenging transitional period. He remarked, “The next 15 years will be hell before we get to heaven,” highlighting the likelihood of a deterioration in the economic and social frameworks that currently underpin the middle class, should the effects of automation be left unregulated.

AI Efficiency and Staffing Changes

Drawing from his own entrepreneurial journey, Gawdat revealed that his AI startup, which aims to create emotionally intelligent systems, now operates efficiently with just three personnel. He pointed out that a few years ago, a similar venture would have required a team of 300.

Concerns from AI Experts

His fears resonate with other leaders in the AI field. Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” has recently raised alarms about advanced AI models potentially developing their own internal languages, thus complicating control measures. He stated, “If they start thinking in their own language, we might not even know what they’re thinking.”

Broader Societal Issues

Beyond the threat of job losses, Gawdat anticipates a more profound crisis within society. He acknowledged that risks associated with loneliness, identity crisis, and declines in mental well-being may escalate as individuals find themselves sidelined. He warned of a possible surge in “a lot of social unrest.”

The Need for Regulation and Frameworks

While the efficiencies promised by AI are appealing, Gawdat stressed that without appropriate safeguards — including regulations, social safety measures, or new economic structures — this technology could disrupt entire communities and exacerbate income inequality.