Author: Team SS

  • “Tariff Surge to 50%: CureFit’s Founder Urges Urgent Scientific Innovation for India’s Future”

    “Tariff Surge to 50%: CureFit’s Founder Urges Urgent Scientific Innovation for India’s Future”



    Transforming Science and Technology in India – Mukesh Bansal’s Call to Action

    Transforming Science and Technology in India – Mukesh Bansal’s Call to Action

    Mukesh Bansal, the Founder of CureFit, has made a compelling appeal for India to fundamentally overhaul its strategies concerning science and technology. He cautions that the current global geopolitical environment does not allow for any form of complacency.

    In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Bansal remarked that the ongoing geopolitical climate should serve as a significant indication for India to take its scientific and technological ecosystem seriously. He emphasised that this situation should be considered more than a mere warning; it is a matter of existential importance.

    Urgent Action Needed for an Innovation Ecosystem

    Bansal stressed that as the world approaches a transformative technological era, especially with advancements in artificial intelligence, India must prioritise the establishment of a future-ready innovation ecosystem.

    He stated that this moment calls for a shift towards embracing science and research driven by curiosity, constructing elite research infrastructure, encouraging leading Indian scientists to return, and fostering the spirit of ‘Discover in India’ and ‘Invent in India’.

    The Vision of a Developed India

    Bansal firmly believes that the goal of “Viksit Bharat” — a developed India — will remain unachievable without robust scientific and technological foundations.

    This call for action arrives in response to the United States introducing new punitive tariffs on Indian exports, a decision that has unsettled Indian industries and brought to light the dangers of relying on global supply chains and foreign technology.

    Importance of Self-Reliance in Critical Technologies

    The previous 25% tariffs are expected to increase to 50% by August 27, underscoring the urgent requirement for India to cultivate self-reliance in essential technologies and to diminish its reliance on external ecosystems.

    As India prepares to navigate an ever-changing global landscape, advocates like Bansal are highlighting the essential need for sovereign innovation—not just as an economic strategy, but as a crucial national priority.


  • “Anupam Mittal’s Provocative Post Sparks Renewed Discussion on Ethics and Greed in India”

    “Anupam Mittal’s Provocative Post Sparks Renewed Discussion on Ethics and Greed in India”



    Greed: A Misunderstood Motivator in the Startup Ecosystem

    Greed: A Misunderstood Motivator in the Startup Ecosystem

    Anupam Mittal, the Founder & CEO of People Group, ignited a wave of reflection throughout India’s startup ecosystem with a thought-provoking post on LinkedIn. He redefined greed—not as a negative trait but as a misunderstood motivator that requires timely expression.

    Quoting the famous phrase from the film Wall Street, “Greed is good,” Mittal considered how this belief shaped a generation of venture capitalists, founders, and fund managers, ultimately leading to some of the most infamous corporate failures—Enron, Satyam, Theranos, and WeWork. He also mentioned closer examples such as Byju’s, GoMechanic, and BharatPe, where, as he stated, “ambition outpaced ethics.”

    However, Mittal’s insight did not end there. He remarked, “Greed IS good. But not the impatient kind,” referencing Charlie Munger’s observation that “incentives run the world.” He proposed that when greed is interpreted as self-interest, it has propelled human advancement—from railroads and rockets to platforms like Shaadi.com. The core issue, he explained, lies not in greed itself, but in short-term greed.

    “Be long-term greedy,” Mittal advised. “The kind that stretches self-interest across decades, compelling choices that accumulate—forego the shortcuts, attend the mundane meeting, decline shiny distractions, create when there’s no applause, and be present every single day.”

    He highlighted renowned figures like Warren Buffett, Ratan Tata, Jeff Bezos, and Mukesh Ambani as leaders who embraced the long-term vision to generate “disproportionate value not just for themselves, but for employees, investors, and society.”

    This post struck a chord with many, leading to a flood of responses from professionals.

    “True success requires patience and integrity,” one individual commented. “A long-term vision, paired with ethical ambition, will undoubtedly foster innovation and meaningful change.”

    Another user remarked, “It’s not greed that dismantles systems—it’s impatience. Loved the framing: ‘Keep the greed, just set the clock to decades.’ That’s the mentality we need more of.”


  • “Envisioning a  Trillion Future: Gautam Adani’s Blueprint for Nation Building at IIM Lucknow”

    “Envisioning a $25 Trillion Future: Gautam Adani’s Blueprint for Nation Building at IIM Lucknow”



    Adani’s Inspiring Call for India’s Future Leaders

    Adani’s Inspiring Call for India’s Future Leaders

    In a powerful speech at IIM Lucknow, Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani urged India’s future leaders to become the architects of a dynamic new nation. He encouraged them to prioritise courage, character, and contribution rather than comfort, cynicism, and conformity.

    Addressing an enthusiastic crowd of students and faculty, Adani recounted his journey from being a 16-year-old diamond trader in Mumbai to leading one of India’s most diversified conglomerates. He noted, “His journey illustrates that the future does not always develop as smoothly as it seems in classrooms; it is chaotic, unpredictable, and harsh.” He advised the audience to be prepared to not only follow existing pathways but to also create their own.

    He discussed the backstories of the Group’s significant projects:

    Mundra Port

    Once a marshland, Mundra Port has transformed into India’s largest commercial port. Adani mentioned, “Maps can only guide you to places where others have already arrived. To create something genuinely innovative, one requires a compass, and my conviction served that purpose.”

    Carmichael Mine

    Located in Australia, this mine was developed despite global protests and financial hurdles. Adani stated, “The Carmichael project is not merely a tribute to coal but rather a testament to our persistence.”

    Khavda Renewable Energy Park

    A desert area previously thought uninhabitable is set to become the world’s largest single-site renewable energy facility. He remarked, “Barren does not equate to dryness; barren is a place where no aspirations have taken root.”

    Dharavi Redevelopment

    Adani described this as “the most challenging project of all,” stating that it is “not just about convenience but a matter of conscience.”

    “Dharavi is Asia’s largest slum,” he pointed out. “Whenever he flies to Mumbai, the slums below weigh heavily on his conscience, as a nation cannot genuinely prosper while so many of its citizens live without dignity. Many advised against the redevelopment of Dharavi, labelling it too political and risky, but that very reason motivated him to pursue it. The project is not merely about constructing yet another redevelopment initiative; it’s about restoring dignity to the million individuals who played a role in building Mumbai yet have never reaped its benefits.”

    Looking towards the future, Adani indicated that India is at a critical juncture, fuelled by demographics, demand, digital infrastructure, and domestic investment. “You will not merely be witnesses to a five-trillion or ten-trillion-dollar economy; you will observe an India evolving into a $25-trillion powerhouse by 2050.”

    He encouraged students to be innovators rather than passive participants. “Challenge the very essence of the canvas,” he advised.

    “Let your path demonstrate that dreams nurtured on Indian soil can influence the globe. Go forth. Construct. Lead. Roar. India is beckoning you. India is not a dilemma waiting for resolution,” he concluded. “It embodies the solution the world is anticipating.”

    Adani wrapped up with a passionate call to action: “Choose character over cynicism. Emphasise contribution rather than convenience. Opt for courage over comfort.”


  • “The Coming AI Revolution: Why Even CEOs May Face Uncertain Futures”

    “The Coming AI Revolution: Why Even CEOs May Face Uncertain Futures”



    AGI: The Future of Work and Societal Impact | Mo Gawdat Insights


    AGI: The Future of Work and Societal Impact

    Mo Gawdat, the former Chief Business Officer at Google X, addressed the potential of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on the Diary of a CEO podcast. He expressed significant concerns that AGI could soon surpass human capabilities in almost every job, including roles traditionally seen as secure, such as programmers and executives.

    Gawdat stated, “Unless you’re in the top 0.1%, you’re a peasant.” He believes that AGI may outperform humans even in high-level positions like that of a CEO.

    Socioeconomic Turmoil Ahead

    According to Gawdat, the upcoming 15 years will be a challenging transitional period. He remarked, “The next 15 years will be hell before we get to heaven,” highlighting the likelihood of a deterioration in the economic and social frameworks that currently underpin the middle class, should the effects of automation be left unregulated.

    AI Efficiency and Staffing Changes

    Drawing from his own entrepreneurial journey, Gawdat revealed that his AI startup, which aims to create emotionally intelligent systems, now operates efficiently with just three personnel. He pointed out that a few years ago, a similar venture would have required a team of 300.

    Concerns from AI Experts

    His fears resonate with other leaders in the AI field. Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” has recently raised alarms about advanced AI models potentially developing their own internal languages, thus complicating control measures. He stated, “If they start thinking in their own language, we might not even know what they’re thinking.”

    Broader Societal Issues

    Beyond the threat of job losses, Gawdat anticipates a more profound crisis within society. He acknowledged that risks associated with loneliness, identity crisis, and declines in mental well-being may escalate as individuals find themselves sidelined. He warned of a possible surge in “a lot of social unrest.”

    The Need for Regulation and Frameworks

    While the efficiencies promised by AI are appealing, Gawdat stressed that without appropriate safeguards — including regulations, social safety measures, or new economic structures — this technology could disrupt entire communities and exacerbate income inequality.


  • “Nithin Kamath’s Journey Comes Full Circle with Strategic Investment in Former Supporter’s Firm”

    “Nithin Kamath’s Journey Comes Full Circle with Strategic Investment in Former Supporter’s Firm”



    Zerodha’s Investment in Capitalmind Financial Services


    Zerodha’s Investment in Capitalmind Financial Services

    Zerodha, led by Nithin Kamath, has recently invested in Capitalmind Financial Services, a portfolio management firm registered with SEBI and founded by Deepak Shenoy. This funding initiative is part of Rainmatter, Zerodha’s investment arm dedicated to nurturing innovative financial projects.

    Sharing this news on X, Nithin Kamath expressed how the journey has come full circle. He mentioned how surreal it feels to reflect on their relationship over the years.

    Kamath recalled, “Deepak Shenoy was one of the first individuals I discussed the Zerodha idea with. At the beginning, he kindly agreed to lend his credibility by featuring his name on our website as an advisor.” He also expressed happiness in supporting Shenoy’s venture through Rainmatter, accompanied by a photo with Shenoy.

    Deepak Shenoy, in response to Kamath’s announcement, fondly remembered the early days. He shared, “Many thanks, Nithin! It’s hard to believe that I once had credibility to lend to Zerodha! I remember driving around Gurgaon with the initial Zerodha forms in my Hyundai Accent, explaining to people how much brokerage they could save.”

    Many thanks, Nithin! It’s hard to believe that at one time, I had credibility to give to Zerodha! I remember carrying the early Zerodha forms in my Hyundai Accent in Gurgaon – telling people how much brokerage they would save 🙂
    — Deepak Shenoy (@deepakshenoy) August 6, 2025

    Exciting Developments at Capitalmind

    Recently, Shenoy’s firm received a mutual fund license, marking this investment as their inaugural institutional funding round. In an interview with Moneycontrol, Shenoy highlighted their longstanding relationship. He mentioned, “We’ve been acquainted for years and have had multiple discussions regarding our businesses. Rainmatter’s strategy is hands-off, aligning well with Zerodha’s core values. We have also engaged in talks with Zerodha Fund House.”

    Zerodha’s Growth Journey

    Founded in August 2010 by Nithin and Nikhil Kamath, Zerodha began as a bootstrapped entity aiming to simplify trading and reduce costs in India. Over the years, it has grown tremendously, achieving unicorn status in 2019 with a self-assessed valuation of approximately $1 billion following an ESOP buyback. In 2020, the company sought licensing to establish an AMC mutual fund in India and officially launched its fund house in 2023.

    Services Offered by Zerodha

    Zerodha provides services in equity trading, derivatives trading, currency trading, commodity trading, and mutual funds. Throughout its evolution, the firm has emerged as the largest stock brokerage in India, resulting in significant wealth for the Kamath brothers.


  • India’s Deep Tech Revolution: Paving the Way for Tomorrow’s Innovations

    India’s Deep Tech Revolution: Paving the Way for Tomorrow’s Innovations


    India’s Deeptech Ambitions: A Shift Toward Innovation

    India is making significant strides in developing its indigenous capabilities in deeptech, intellectual property, and product innovation, moving beyond its established role as a global technology services hub. This transformation is highlighted by a dynamic startup ecosystem, a wealth of engineering talent, and a consistent commitment to strategic policy initiatives.

    Despite these advancements, the transition of innovations in areas such as autonomous vehicles, drones, artificial intelligence, defence technologies, energy security, space, quantum technology, and security systems from laboratory settings to market leadership poses considerable challenges. By learning from the experiences of pioneers like the US and China, the Government of India (GOI) must urgently establish strong foundations to fulfil its deeptech ambitions.

    Government as Grant Provider and Key Customer

    The Government of India’s commitment to deeptech is robust at a rhetorical level but still lacks the necessary practical implementation and scaling efforts. Supporters of the GOI might note the considerable shift in focus towards fostering homegrown deeptech capabilities; however, the actual mechanisms needed for tangible assistance remain mired in bureaucratic obstacles.

    There’s no need to reinvent the wheel when it comes to this model; India can adopt successful strategies from other economies valued at over $5 trillion to operate at the required pace.

    The technological dominance of the US has been established over decades and continues to attract top talent due to vigorous bipartisan support for investment in maintaining this edge. Multiple US agencies, including DARPA, BARDA, NSF, NASA, and the Department of Defence, have collectively funneled trillions of dollars into national R&D across universities, corporations, and startups. These agencies also commit substantial procurement budgets to support commercial viability.

    An often-cited example of this approach is how Oracle’s first client for its relational database in the 1970s was the CIA. More recently, Anduril, a defence technology startup, secured several contracts from the US Department of Defence, which included $22 billion for augmented reality defence systems and $249 million for advanced air defence, allowing the company to achieve global relevance almost instantly.

    Investing in innovation driven by domestic talent and private businesses, rather than solely relying on public sector units (PSUs), is an established blueprint that should be at the heart of India’s strategy.

    China has effectively built its competitive edge against the US in three decades using state-sponsored intellectual property and process onshoring in various sectors, including luxury goods, electric vehicles, smartphones, and high-speed trains. Documented strategies illustrate a comprehensive approach addressing every significant sector of the global economy, particularly focusing on talent and technologies vital for national security and competitive advantage.

    Estimates from the FBI suggest that China’s appropriation of American intellectual property costs the US economy between $225 billion and $600 billion annually. A Wall Street Journal study highlighted that Huawei received approximately $46 billion in state-backed loans and around $25 billion in tax incentives from 2008 to 2018, illustrating significant support from the state across multiple sectors.

    While China’s methods may violate World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) standards and global market norms, its status as a global player in various tech sectors is unquestionable.

    Conversely, the GOI has focused on a PSU-led approach since independence, which has not fostered an indigenous innovation framework at the scale necessary for a $4 trillion GDP. In recent years, the current administration has taken notable steps towards revitalising this ecosystem, as seen in the success of the targeted military operation in 2025.

    Nonetheless, budget allocations and the necessary follow-up actions are inadequate to meet future demands. India’s recent commitment of INR 20,000 crore (approximately $2.4 billion) to deeptech is a positive start but remains insubstantial compared to the scale and predictability of investments from the US and China. One contract awarded to Anduril alone exceeds India’s entire annual defence R&D budget.

    The government’s role as a grant provider, primary customer, and facilitator of procurement for transformative local technology needs strengthening. Initiatives such as iDEX and the IndiaAI Mission are steps in the right direction; however, implementation has not kept pace with the ambitious vision of India’s leadership and the aspirations of its citizens. Securing a pilot project does not guarantee larger-scale outcomes, and many initiatives rely on limited grants or uncertain integration opportunities.

    Without significant and direct government investment, India’s deeptech ecosystem will struggle to achieve the financial stability required for global competition. The private sector cannot afford to make long-term investments in technologies that lack established commercial markets. The government must take the lead as the primary driver of grants and as an anchor client, ensuring that domestic deeptech firms can thrive in a secure environment conducive to innovation.

    What the GOI Needs to Implement

    • Substantially increase both the magnitude and continuity of grants and procurement commitments.
    • Significantly improve grant administration by implementing a merit-based process to attract experienced minds from private enterprises.
    • Simplify pilot-to-procurement pathways with transparent, time-sensitive frameworks and established teams incentivised to achieve results.
    • Create military and civilian test environments in cooperation with the industry and universities, allowing startups and local innovators to test before full deployment.
    • Encourage risk-taking among citizens and private enterprises while reducing dependence on PSUs and civil servant-driven planning.

    Long-term Policy and Investor Clarity

    Deeptech necessitates patient, long-term investment, which only local sources can provide if there is stability in regulations and policies. While the Indian venture capital landscape and family-operated office structures have matured, they predominantly adhere to traditional funding cycles, expecting returns within a decade.

    For these investors to substantially support deeptech initiatives, the investment environment must evolve. They require certainty regarding where to invest and whether the necessary policy frameworks will support and scale those companies over the long term.

    In contrast, deeptech investors in the US and China function within sophisticated, predictable ecosystems, bolstered by governments that have laid out decades-long industrial policies complemented by clear regulations, tax benefits, safe harbour provisions, and guarantees for market creation.

    The CHIPS and Science Act in the US, for instance, allocates $280 billion for federal investment in sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum technology, paired with comprehensive plans for implementation over five years. Meanwhile, in China, state-supported guidance funds, such as the $47.5 billion big fund or the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, amalgamate equity investments with subsidised loans, tax exemptions, and government contracts, giving investors long-term visibility for revenue growth and scaling potential.

    The GOI must rebuild trust in its policies and processes, taking proactive steps to foster this confidence. Indian investors contend with a landscape marked by ambiguous regulations, unpredictable IP rules affecting dual-use technologies, and uncertain procurement flows. This situation creates a shortage of “15-year thesis” capital essential for establishing deeptech giants.



    India’s Deeptech Innovation: Foundation Setting For The Future


    India’s Deeptech Innovation: Foundation Setting For The Future

    India’s deeptech innovation landscape faces significant challenges due to follow-through delays, such as the National Deep Tech Startup Policy announced in 2023 but still not operational. These delays deepen the concern among Indian long-term capital providers that policies in India often fail to be executed within the timely frameworks innovation cycles require. If the Government of India (GOI) is genuinely aiming to collaborate with private businesses and local capital, it must acknowledge these issues and work on building the necessary bridges.

    What The GOI Must Do

    Safe Harbour Provisions For Stability

    The government needs to provide comprehensive, long-term regulatory and incentive roadmaps across various industries. Protecting against retroactive policies, changes in taxation, and regulatory shifts will help mitigate baseline risks. For instance, establishing the Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) guidelines as a 10-year policy with non-cancellation protections would be highly beneficial for boosting significant capital expenditure investments in the country’s enterprises.

    Incentive Frameworks

    The introduction of tax incentives, co-investment funds, and R&D grants that reward long-term investments in deeptech sectors, energy security, and National Mission aligned companies is essential. Such frameworks should resemble the US’s Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) exemption.

    Transparency

    To instil confidence in investors, the government should publish a 15-year roadmap addressing deeptech, energy, food security, manufacturing, and other key areas. This should include sector-specific frameworks for export, dual-use, and intellectual property support.

    Building Integrated Ecosystems: The Role Of PSUs, Universities And Industry

    No nation excels in deeptech without an effective innovation ecosystem. Examples from Israel’s Iron Dome, America’s defence industrial base, and the Make in China 2025 strategy highlight the impact of collaboration among universities, industry, and government. India requires its own version of a military industrial complex that does not rely solely on Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and governmental employees.

    Historically, Indian PSUs have engaged in closed-loop development cycles over decades, often plagued by issues like corruption and inefficiency. A shift towards reimagining PSUs as incubators for home-grown innovation could transform this scenario.

    PSUs and organisations like ISRO, DRDO, HAL, and BEL have the potential to play a key role in partnering with startups and private enterprises for co-development and systems integration. Universities, especially institutions like IITs and IISc, can facilitate the transition from lab-based research to market-ready products through effective incubators and technology transfer offices.

    Successful models already exist, such as Israel’s collaboration between startups and intelligence testbeds for cybersecurity, or university-industry partnerships in the US involving Stanford and Silicon Valley. Indian universities sit on a wealth of research and possess much of the country’s best talent, yet their innovations seldom make it to market and the most gifted individuals often pursue opportunities abroad.

    Major Gaps

    Systems Integration

    Many Indian startups continue to develop standalone solutions. Effective operational deployment necessitates integration with existing defence and civilian systems, which calls for joint testbeds and standardised protocols.

    Testing Infrastructure

    Access to live-fire ranges, operational networks, and realistic testing environments is limited for most startups. This leads to late-stage identification of flaws, driving up costs and diminishing confidence among founders and investors.

    Talent And Trust

    While India’s founders and innovators possess significant technical skills, they often lack experience in operational defence or real-world deployment. Conversely, PSU and agency stakeholders tend to regard startups as outsiders, hindering effective collaboration.

    Constraints On Universities

    India’s top academics face heavy regulation, causing grant processes to move exceedingly slowly. The budget for 2025-26 announced support for research fellowships in AI, yet this initiative arrives three years after the launch of ChatGPT, highlighting a lag in response to the AI arms race.

    What GOI Must Do

    The GOI should deepen partnerships with PSUs and universities for joint product development, integration labs, and live testbeds. Establishing exchanges among founders, veterans, and PSU scientists will bring operational credibility to startups. Additionally, integrating private sector leaders into advisory roles within PSUs is crucial.

    An architecture akin to the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) is necessary for each deeptech and innovation vertical, spanning nuclear energy, space technology, materials engineering, and AI.

    Supporting modular “dual-use” architectures will allow innovations to cater to both sovereign and civilian markets. Clear specifications regarding sovereign use are needed to channel numerous projects towards universities and corporations for prompt development.

    The leadership of GOI grants should be driven by experts from private enterprises, similar to initiatives like Aadhar and UPI, to accelerate research on university campuses nationwide.

    The path is clear for the GOI: Integrate deeptech into national policy architecture or risk enduring technological dependency—a situation India has faced for the past 200 years.

    To compete effectively in the global innovation arena, India must transition from reactive measures to a proactive, risk-positive approach that embeds deeptech innovation within the very core of state capacity and national strategy. Historically, India’s strengths have included its talent, ambition, and resilience. To convert these into national and global competitiveness in deeptech, the government must urgently establish robust and flexible foundations.

    The post India’s Deeptech Innovation: Foundation Setting For The Future appeared first on StartupSuperb Media.



  • “Harsh Goenka on AI’s Transformation of Work: Embracing Change and New Opportunities”

    “Harsh Goenka on AI’s Transformation of Work: Embracing Change and New Opportunities”


    AI’s Impact on Jobs: Insights from Harsh Goenka

    AI has become a significant force in transforming employment landscapes, prompting RPG Enterprises Chairman Harsh Goenka to address the increasing anxiety surrounding potential job losses. He also highlighted the emerging opportunities that AI is set to create.

    Goenka noted, “Everyone is concerned: Will AI take my job? What new roles will AI generate?” He believes that AI will revolutionise workplaces and create new positions such as Prompt Engineers, AI Product Managers, and AI Ethics Specialists. The competitive edge will belong to those who are most adaptable and intelligent.

    His comments sparked a lively debate on social media, with mixed reactions. One user endorsed Goenka’s perspective, stating that AI does not inherently eliminate jobs, as guiding AI will still be essential. They emphasized, “AI has actually expanded the job market, which is why companies like Capgemini are now hiring fresh graduates. The role of AI Ethics Specialists is vital in distinguishing reality from artificial constructs, and it is humans who will guide AI’s development.”

    Another individual shared a broader perspective, reflecting on the profound consequences of AI: “AI will undoubtedly disrupt our lives while introducing new applications. However, human emotions and connections will always remain crucial. In 20 or 30 years, when humanity has evolved further, there may be a desire to return to simpler village life.”

    Additionally, a recent study by Microsoft Research provides an in-depth analysis of how AI could shape the future of work.

    The research identifies 40 job categories that are most susceptible to disruption by AI and another 40 that are least likely to be affected. While this study focuses on roles within the U.S., experts suggest that the findings apply to both developed and developing nations.

    Kiran Tomlinson, a Senior Researcher at Microsoft, explained, “Our research investigates which job categories can effectively utilise AI chatbots. It introduces an AI applicability score that assesses the alignment between AI capabilities and job responsibilities, illuminating areas where AI could alter work practices, rather than eliminate roles.”

  • Bengaluru Man’s ₹415 Cab Fare for 6km Sparks Online Debate

    Bengaluru Man’s ₹415 Cab Fare for 6km Sparks Online Debate



    High Cab Prices in Bengaluru: A Resident’s Struggle




    A Bengaluru resident recently took to social media to express concerns regarding skyrocketing cab fares and the difficulty of securing rides in the city. In the post, the individual detailed their challenges in booking a cab on Wednesday, mentioning that no rides were available.

    The resident reported that when they finally managed to secure a ride, the fare was an astonishing ₹415 for a mere 6-km journey.

    The post included statements reflecting their frustration: “A cab has not been accepted for over an hour. The prices are inflating rapidly – ₹415 for 6 kms? Is this a joke? This situation is unheard of for me, as I usually plan my departure to avoid these issues, and I’m well within the expected timeframe.”

    This post quickly gained traction, resonating with many netizens who empathised with the resident’s situation. Some users even pointed out that Wednesdays were often synonymous with working from home.

    One commenter remarked, “I wonder where the supporters of ride-sharing who encouraged against personal transport have gone. Traffic has been painfully slow lately – it’s simply unbearable now.”

    Another user shared, “The message from Wednesday is loud and clear – stay home, my friend.”

    A third commenter added, “The roads are chaotic this morning. I left at 6:40 am, and it felt like peak hour. Some of this madness involves cows. They don’t move, no matter how much you honk. Regarding surge pricing, the apps monitor the frequency of new bookings from specific locations based on GPS coordinates. The more you try, the higher the price seems to climb. A trick I’ve learnt is to initiate a booking, let it time out, and then try again. This often reveals a lower fare since it shows the cheapest price if a driver cancels after accepting.”

    A fourth user suggested, “For distances under 10 kms, I prefer taking my bike. There’s no need to wait for cabs or autos. Rather than endure nearly an hour of frustration, I can simply ride and arrive at my destination. I understand the risk of rain, but with the flexibility to choose my departure time, I can plan accordingly.”


  • “Engineering Student Weighs ₹50K Job Offer Against Peers’ ₹1 Lakh Salaries, Sparking Online Debate”

    “Engineering Student Weighs ₹50K Job Offer Against Peers’ ₹1 Lakh Salaries, Sparking Online Debate”






    Engineering Student Consideration for Job Offer


    Engineering Student Consideration for Job Offer

    A user recently shared on social media regarding an engineering student contemplating the rejection of a ₹50,000 per month job offer from a reputable firm. The post highlighted that the neighbour’s son got an opportunity from Forbes Marshal, known for its prominence in his field, largely due to the costs associated with moving from Ahmedabad to Pune.

    Additionally, the user mentioned efforts to persuade the neighbour’s son to accept this job instead of waiting for potentially better offers.

    The user stated, “He’s thinking of declining because he has to move from Ahmedabad to Pune, and it’s not feasible to manage living expenses on that salary. I am trying to encourage him to consider this offer as it presents a significant learning opportunity, and he can gain valuable experience for a few years.”

    However, the relocation expense was not the only factor influencing the young man’s decision to possibly decline the offer.

    “He mentioned that others are receiving offers of ₹1 lakh or more in different fields, prompting him to consider biding his time for better prospects. His parents have invested over ₹15 lakhs in his engineering education, and now he is uncertain about his next steps.”

    Interestingly, the neighbour’s son is nearing the end of his engineering studies, with campus placements currently underway. Forbes Marshal, a top company relevant to his study area, is offering around ₹40,000 to ₹50,000 monthly.

    “He’s contemplating declining because the relocation from Ahmedabad to Pune is a significant factor.”

    The post created a division among netizens, with some arguing that a young adult could easily manage living in Pune on a ₹50,000 monthly salary. Others feel the student is justified in seeking a higher salary due to the costs of relocation and the financial investment his parents have made in his education.

    “If I were in his situation, I would accept it. ₹50,000 per month would help manage the first year in Pune. Affordable and good food options are widely available,” a commenter noted.

    “The issue lies in how he is comparing himself to others. Instead of evaluating how this role might benefit him and bring him closer to his aspirations, he’s measuring his worth against someone else’s salary, which is a significant oversight,” wrote another user.

    “Young people often chase ‘better’ offers due to the hefty ₹15 lakhs investment. While his parents may be fine with a ₹50,000 monthly salary, he personally struggles with that decision. Accepting the offer seems wise, but such thoughts are hard to ignore,” observed yet another netizen.

    “A white-collar job is truly not worth pursuing unless it presents a plan to achieve a ₹5 lakh monthly salary within ten years,” remarked a fourth commenter.


  • “Challenging the System: How One Risk Consultant Exposes Flaws in India’s Government Job Landscape”

    “Challenging the System: How One Risk Consultant Exposes Flaws in India’s Government Job Landscape”


    Shocking Wealth of a Mid-Level Inspector Highlights Corruption in India

    When discussing the alarming wealth distribution in India, consider this: a mid-level Motor Vehicle Inspector earns a salary of ₹50,000 a month while possessing 44 plots of land, ₹1 crore in cash, 250 grams of gold, and residing in a lavish 3,300 sq ft home. Rather than a billionaire industrialist, this individual’s financial status has sparked national outrage regarding the corruption permeating India’s supposedly “secure” government jobs.

    Corruption in Government Jobs

    Parth Sanghvi, a risk consultant, captured public sentiment in a viral LinkedIn post when he asked, “Is this why government jobs remain in demand in India?” He indicated that the salary merely compensates for attendance, while significant income derives from the system that citizens fund daily.

    A Parallel Economy

    Sanghvi’s commentary resonated strongly, articulating the suspicions held by many Indians: beneath seemingly modest salaries lies a vast parallel economy driven by power dynamics, bribery, and unchecked wealth accumulation. If a mid-level inspector can amass this fortune, one can only speculate the wealth held by those in higher bureaucratic positions.

    Social Media Reaction

    The revelation triggered a social media frenzy, with opinions varying widely. Some applauded the inspector as a prime example of generational wealth creation, while others highlighted the grim reality that by the time such officials are implicated in wrongdoing, they have already secured enough wealth to nullify any repercussions.

    Many commentators expressed despair over a system they believe is irrevocably broken, where corruption has become the norm rather than a shock. One user bluntly stated, “India isn’t resource-starved, just bled dry by those sworn to serve it.”

    Nuanced Perspectives

    Amidst the outrage, a handful of voices offered a more nuanced perspective, suggesting that a flawed system enables misuse by some while overshadowing the integrity of many others. The general agreement? It is not merely one bad apple; rather, the entire orchard is implicated.

    This is precisely the insight shared by Sanghvi. The situation does not pertain solely to this one inspector. It reflects a broader system that incentivises silent complicity, punishes those who act with honesty, and allows corruption to masquerade as efficiency.

    The comment that might have resonated the most was deeply pessimistic: Babus ka zamana hai. For individuals who refuse to engage in such practices, the consequences can be dire.