Starlink’s Satellite Internet Plans in India

Elon Musk’s Starlink and various satellite communication firms, such as Eutelsat OneWeb, backed by Bharti Group, alongside Reliance Jio’s collaboration with SES, and Globalstar, are gearing up to launch high-speed satellite internet services across India. As reported by The Economic Times, Starlink is set to roll out unlimited data plans at promotional rates below $10 (approximately ₹840) per month, an approach aimed at swiftly expanding its user base in one of the globe’s largest telecommunications markets.

Affordable Pricing to Boost Adoption

Despite facing high spectrum and licensing fees, satellite service providers are striving for rapid growth by presenting cost-effective options. Experts believe this tactic may allow these companies to recover their substantial investments in infrastructure and spectrum by catering to a larger customer base. The ultimate aim is to attract up to 10 million users in India.

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has suggested a 4% levy on adjusted gross revenue (AGR), with a minimum annual spectrum fee of ₹3,500 per megahertz. Additionally, these providers will incur an 8% licensing fee. In urban regions, operators will be responsible for an extra ₹500 per subscriber annually, although rural areas will not be subjected to this fee. These proposals are pending final government confirmation.

Hardware Expenses as a Potential Obstacle

While the monthly subscription pricing may appear enticing, the initial investment required for Starlink hardware could discourage many potential Indian customers. On a global scale, Starlink kits are sold between $250 and $380 (approximately ₹21,300 to ₹32,400), which represents a considerable expense when contrasted with India’s fibre broadband services. These services often provide speeds of up to 1 Gbps, feature lower installation costs, and frequently come with bundled OTT subscriptions.

Regulatory Landscape and Competitor Developments

Though Eutelsat OneWeb and Jio-SES have already obtained regulatory clearances, Starlink has a letter of intent from the Indian Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and is waiting for final approval from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe).

Capacity Limitations May Restrict Expansion

Despite Starlink’s ambitious strategies, technological restrictions may hinder its growth prospects in India. The geographic coverage offered by the satellite constellation within India is limited, estimated to account for only 0.7% to 0.8% of global satellite capacity, equating to merely 700 to 800 satellites available to cover the nation at any moment. This limitation contrasts sharply with India’s extensive terrestrial infrastructure, which boasts over 800,000 telecom towers and 3 million base transceiver stations.

For comparison, in Bangladesh, Starlink currently charges 6,000 BDT (approximately ₹4,200) per month. New users are also required to pay a one-time equipment fee of 47,000 BDT (₹33,000) and an additional shipping fee of 2,800 BDT (₹2,000), resulting in total initial costs nearing ₹37,200.

Apple’s Legal Challenge on Encryption and Data Access in the UK

Apple has initiated a legal contest against a directive from the UK government mandating the company to establish a system for allowing law enforcement to access encrypted cloud data. This appeal, submitted to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, arises in response to a confidential instruction from the Home Office issued in January, which called for Apple to facilitate access to iCloud backups in instances involving national security or significant criminal activities, as reported by the Financial Times and BBC News.

In lieu of complying with this demand, Apple has chosen to suspend its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) feature within the UK. ADP is an optional security feature that provides end-to-end encryption for cloud data, ensuring that even Apple cannot access the stored messages, photos, and files. By discontinuing this feature for users in the UK, Apple has effectively guaranteed its ability to retrieve specific iCloud backups, including duplicates of iMessages, when legally required.

The Ongoing Debate on Encryption and Access to Private Data

This decision has revived a worldwide discussion regarding encryption and governmental access to private information. Law enforcement officials contend that encryption obstructs inquiries into serious crimes such as terrorism and child exploitation. Conversely, privacy advocates caution that diminishing encryption could lead to security vulnerabilities for all users.

International Criticism and Legal Implications

Apple’s choice to deactivate ADP in the UK has drawn backlash from privacy defenders, while the UK government asserts that access to user data will be granted only in exceptional situations. A spokesperson from the Home Office informed the BBC that privacy protections remain intact, asserting that “privacy is only affected on an exceptional basis, in relation to the most severe crimes and only when necessary and proportionate.”

The directive has also faced scrutiny from the United States. Former US President Donald Trump equated the UK’s requests to practices commonly associated with China during an interview with The Spectator. At the same time, US authorities are exploring whether the UK’s stance breaches the CLOUD Act, a data-sharing regulation that prohibits the UK from independently demanding access to the data of US citizens.

Tulsi Gabbard, the US Director of National Intelligence, has reportedly expressed apprehensions in a letter, indicating that she was not informed prior to the UK’s request and that an investigation would determine if Britain acted beyond the bounds of its agreements with the US.

Apple’s Ongoing Legal Proceedings

While Apple has not publicly addressed its legal challenge, reports from the Financial Times suggest that the case may be reviewed in the forthcoming weeks, although it remains uncertain whether the proceedings will be conducted publicly. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal has yet to reply to requests for clarification regarding the matter.

The UK government has neither affirmed nor denied the existence of the order, citing legal constraints that prevent such revelations. According to UK legislation, companies receiving technical capability notices are prohibited from discussing them publicly. Nevertheless, the Home Office maintains that its policies are designed to protect citizens from severe crimes while upholding essential privacy protections.

Apple has consistently reiterated its commitment to preserving its security features, expressing regret over the necessity of taking this step in the UK. The company’s determination to contest the order escalates a crucial legal struggle concerning data privacy, governmental surveillance, and the evolving landscape of encryption within the UK.